Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

(DOWNLOAD) "William H. Seymour and Dayton S. Morgan, Plaintiffs in Error v. Cyrus H. Mccormick" by United States Supreme Court # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

William H. Seymour and Dayton S. Morgan, Plaintiffs in Error v. Cyrus H. Mccormick

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: William H. Seymour and Dayton S. Morgan, Plaintiffs in Error v. Cyrus H. Mccormick
  • Author : United States Supreme Court
  • Release Date : January 01, 1853
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 79 KB

Description

Sixth. Where the claim on which the suit is founded is for an improvement on old machines, patented or unpatented, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, as a measure of damages, the mechanical profits that he could make upon the whole machine, including the old part. His damages are limited to the profits on making and vending the improvement patented and infringed. The plaintiff recited in his declaration and furnished oyer of his old patent of 1834, for a reaping machine, which expired in 1848, and his patent of 1845, which is described as an 'improvement upon his patented machine.' In his patent of 1847, he claims 'new and useful improvements in the reaping machine formerly patented by me,' in which he also claims other improvements besides the one in controversy, which is his last claim, and relates to the seat. For the purpose of this suit, the machine described in the patent of 1834, (which had in fact become public property,) and the improvements in the patent of 1845, and a large portion of those included in that of 1847, the defendants had a perfectly lawful right to use. This covered the whole of the improved reaping machine, except what related to the seat, and its combination with the reel. It cost the defendants to make their machine, which had no seat, about $64.26. There was no proof to show the extent of the cost of the plaintiff's seat. One was made by Zinck, for one dollar. The plaintiff allowed Brown in effect, in 1845, 1846, $75 each, for making machines without the elevated seat–and he proved on this trial by Blakesley, that it cost him only $36, and by Dorman, $37, to make them with it. There can be no pretence that the addition of the seat, and what is covered by the last claim, added much, if any thing, to the cost of constructing the improved machine. The plaintiff proved by Blakesley, that the manufacturer's profit on the whole machine, including a $30 patent fee, was $74.


PDF Ebook Download "William H. Seymour and Dayton S. Morgan, Plaintiffs in Error v. Cyrus H. Mccormick" Online ePub Kindle